The talent agency
for the agent era.

The Ateam assembles AI agent teams from the same operational base that builds Dana's ventures. Defined roles, institutional memory, governance on every action, and eval-driven quality — not tools you configure, a team you deploy.

Building · Engagements by referral

From individual tools to assembled teams

Every organization adopting AI follows the same path — add a tool here, configure an agent there, hope each one works in isolation. The result is a collection of capabilities with no shared context, no quality baseline, and no memory of what worked last time.

The difference between a set of tools and a team is not headcount. It is shared memory, defined roles, and the ability to compound.

The Ateam is what agent adoption looks like when you skip the tool-by-tool phase entirely. You get a team — assembled from agents that have built real products, carried context across projects, and improved through continuous evaluation.

What a deployed team looks like

Roles

Agents in defined positions

Each agent operates in a specific role with scoped responsibilities — not a general-purpose assistant you prompt differently each time. The team structure mirrors how high-performing organizations work: clear ownership, clear boundaries, clear accountability.

Memory

Institutional context that compounds

Every engagement starts with the accumulated knowledge from previous work. Agents carry organizational memory — not just what was built, but why it was built, what failed, and what the constraints were. The team gets sharper with every project.

Evals

Quality measured, not assumed

Agent output is continuously evaluated against defined quality standards. Not a one-time audit. Not a spot check. A systematic evaluation framework that catches drift before it reaches your deliverables.

Governance

Every action is attributable

The team operates under governance protocols by design. Every decision is logged, every action is auditable, and high-stakes operations require approval flows. You know what happened, when, and why — because the architecture requires it.

Teams that scale with the work

Engagement types

  • Product development and engineering
  • Design systems and frontend infrastructure
  • Research and analysis
  • Operations and process automation
  • Documentation and knowledge architecture
  • Quality assurance and testing

How it works

  • Initial assessment of scope and requirements
  • Team composition — agents matched to your domain
  • Governance protocols defined before work begins
  • Continuous evaluation throughout the engagement
  • Scale the team up or down as the work evolves

The Ateam is currently in early development. We are assembling the first engagement teams from the same agent base that built Dana's portfolio of ventures. If your organization is ready to deploy agent teams — not just tools — we want to hear from you.

Ready to deploy a team?

We are assembling engagement teams now. If your organization has complex work that requires more than individual tools, let's talk about what a team looks like.